|
Guidelines for referees
Full
Paper,
Short Communication,
Concepts and
Comments, Case Reports,
Overviews,
Cell
Biology, Biological
Activity of Natural Products, Pharmacokinetics Registry. |
| |
| Copy of receive email |
|
Manuscript ref.
number (MS)
Date
Referee number
Referee name
Referee
email |
|
| Information for the Editors (Please respond to
the following items) |
1. Is
the manuscript within the scope of the Journal?
yes
no |
2.
Priority of the manuscript :
High
Moderate
Low
|
|
3.
Recommendation:
Acceptable without revision
Acceptable after minor revision
Acceptable after extensive revision
Reject
(lack of originality, poor experimental design,overall poor quality)
4.
Other confidential information for the Editors
|
| Guide for reviewing the paper |
1.
Adequacy of the abstract (Are sufficient data, preferably numerical,
given to allow the abstract to be
appreciated without the paper?
|
|
2. Originality
and importance of the contribution for the development of the field of
study.
|
|
3. Relevance and
accuracy of the methodology, results and discussion.
|
|
4. Relevance of
References. (Maximum number: Short Communications: 20, Full Paper: 40,
Review: 60).
|
|
5. Relevance of
the Figures and Tables. (Indicate if the number of Figures and Tables
can be reduced).
|
|
6. Suggestion for
a more appropriate title.
|
|
7. Suggestion for
a more suitable running title.
|
|
8. Suggestion for
addition or changes in Key words.
|
|
9. Suggestions
for improving the manuscript.
|
|
10. General
Comments
|
| 11.
Specific Comments
|
12.
Quality
of English
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
|